Tania and Kabir were a young and beautiful couple who were in a dilemma. Their dream of having a home was within their reach, but a question in their minds was, “What loan amount to go for – 30 lakh or 40 lakh home loan?”
As they sipped tea on their balcony, Kabir said, “Tania, I have been thinking a lot about our home. What do you think about the loan proceeds?”
Tania, being a practical individual said, “Let us weigh the options, Kabir. What would be the EMI for a 30-lakh home loan, and how does it differ from a 40-lakh one?”
And so began their journey into the intricate world of home loans.
Distinction points –
The couple quickly realised that the EMI for a 30-lakh home loan would be a more manageable figure compared to its 40-lakh counterpart. This crucial insight brought them face-to-face with the practicality of their monthly budget, prompting contemplation on the sustainability of the financial commitment associated with a higher loan amount.
Kabir and Tania delved into the heart of their dilemma, recognising that the most striking disparity lay in the loan amount itself. A 30-lakh loan versus a 40-lakh one meant a substantial 10-lakh difference. This financial fork in the road prompted them to carefully weigh the pros and cons, considering the long-term implications on their financial well-being.
With the higher loan amount came the realisation that the tenure for a 40 lakh home loan EMI might extend further into the future compared to a 30-lakh home loan EMI. The couple pondered the implications of a more extended commitment, weighing the benefits of quicker ownership against the burden of prolonged financial responsibility.
The down payment consideration brought a practical dimension to their decision-making process. Opting for a 30-lakh loan would mean a more reasonable down payment, aligning with their current financial capacity and allowing them to start their homeownership journey on a steadier financial footing.
As Kabir and Tania projected forward, they discovered a stark reality – the interest outgo for a 40-lakh loan would be significantly higher over the loan tenure. This revelation raised concerns about the overall cost of fulfilling their dream home and the impact on their long-term financial stability.
Kabir voiced a valid concern – a 40 lakh loan might strain their monthly budget more than a 30 lakh one. The realisation of potential financial strain prompted a deeper evaluation of their financial goals and the importance of maintaining a comfortable lifestyle amidst their pursuit of homeownership.
Exploring loan eligibility, Kabir and Tania uncovered that a 40-lakh loan might demand a higher income threshold, posing a potential roadblock in their path to approval. This realisation prompted them to assess their current and future earning potential.
The disparity in budget influenced their dreams for the type of home they could afford. Tania envisioned a larger, more luxurious home with a 40-lakh budget, while Kabir inclined towards a more affordable option that aligned with their financial prudence.
Both loan options offered tax benefits, but the 40-lakh loan provided slightly higher deductions. The couple now faced the challenge of weighing the allure of enhanced tax benefits against the financial strain associated with the higher loan amount.
The couple discovered that prepayment charges for a 40-lakh loan could be higher than those for a 30-lakh loan. This insight prompted them to consider their future financial flexibility and the potential desire to repay the loan ahead of schedule.
Delving into discussions about risk tolerance, Kabir and Tania acknowledged that a 30-lakh loan was less risky in the long run. This consideration emphasised the importance of financial prudence and the ability to weather economic uncertainties.
Analysing the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio, they found that a 30-lakh loan was more favourable, requiring a lower percentage as a down payment. This discovery provided clarity on the initial financial commitment required for each loan option.
Loan processing time
Kabir noted that the processing time for a 40-lakh loan might be longer due to additional documentation. This realisation prompted them to weigh the benefits of expeditious processing against the lure of a higher loan amount.
Tania insisted that a 40-lakh budget would open up possibilities in more prime locations. This brought the couple face to face with the compromise between a dream location and the practicality of their budget constraints.
With a 40-lakh budget, Kabir felt they might have more negotiation power with builders. This insight opened a realm of possibilities, including potential discounts or additional amenities that a higher budget could command.
Kabir learned that a higher loan amount might qualify for different loan types, offering varied interest rates. This insight prompted a nuanced exploration of interest rate dynamics and their implications on the overall cost of homeownership.
Considering their future, the couple evaluated how the EMI for a 40-lakh loan might impact their goals. This included considerations for education, travel, and other life milestones, emphasising the need for a loan that aligns with their broader life aspirations.
Credit score impact
The couple found that defaulting on loan proceeds of 40 lakh could have a considerable effect on their score. This realisation highlighted the significance of selecting loan proceeds in match with their risk appetite and financial potential.
Go through the choices of loan portability, they understood it could be more advantageous for a 30-lakh loan. This endowed a flexibility layer to their process of decision-making, offering a platform for potential future refinancing or changes.
After considerable assessment, Kabir and Tania decided to opt for the 30-lakh home loan. It was not about the loan size but the assurance it endowed to your lives. Their dream home may be a tad smaller, however, the homeownership joy without the burden of heavy EMI, filled them with contentment.